Ahead Of CRA Deadline, Administration Prioritizes Political Agenda Over Combatting Pandemic
Accountable.Us Found That In The Last Full Week Before Congressional Review Act (CRA) Deadline, The Trump Administration Introduced Only One Rule Related to Coronavirus
Accountable.US, a nonpartisan watchdog group, found that from the beginning of May 11th through May 20th, the Trump administration made final 50 rules across nine different agencies. Of those rules, just one dealt with the coronavirus crisis — and it merely delayed an effective date due to the pandemic.
Accountable.US previously conducted a broader investigation, which found the same troubling pattern of the administration quietly pursuing its anti-regulatory agenda while the public’s eyes are averted in the midst of a crisis. From February 11th to May 8th, the administration put forward at least 730 new rules or proposed rules across nine agencies. Of those rules and proposed rules, 18 — or just over two percent — dealt directly or even indirectly with the coronavirus crisis.
“While America is struggling to deal with the virus and destruction it has left in its wake, The Trump administration has decided to continue jamming through its conservative political agenda instead of combatting the crisis at hand,” said Kyle Herrig, Accountable.US president. “Americans will feel the pain of the administration’s terrible handling of this crisis for years to come.”
Below are two examples of rules the administration pushed through at the last minute, instead of dealing with the crisis at hand:
- The Department of Education moved the publication of its changes to Title IX sexual harassment regulations from May 22 to May 19 — just barely making it under the wire for a potential CRA review deadline. Even now, that highly controversial rule is being challenged in courts.
- The Department of Labor published a rule just under the wire that expanded the powers of Secretary Eugene Scalia — namely, to be able to overturn rulings from the Administrative Review Board which hears appeals from parties that disagree with decisions of Administrative Law judges.